Go Back to Browsing Options
< rdf:RDF >< rdf:Description rdf:about="8222" >< dc:title >New Jerseyans for a Death Penalty Moratorium v. New jersey Department of Corrections< /dc:title >< dc:date >2005-02-28 14:00:00< /dc:date >< dc:format >< /dc:format >< dc:language > en< /dc:language >< dc:identifier >A-63-04< /dc:identifier >< dc:description >Do the fee enhancement principles adopted in Rendine v. Pantzer, 141 N.J. 292 (1995), apply to a case in which a pro bono attorney, acting without benefit of a written contingent fee agreement and without expectation of a fee from his client, successfully litigates a public interest matter under a statute containing a fee-shifting provision?< /dc:description >< rdfs:Class rdfs:label=" justice " >< dc:contributer >Lewis A. Scheindlin< /dc:contributer >< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="0" >< /rdfs:Class >< dc:contributer >Kevin D. Walsh< /dc:contributer >< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="1" >< /rdfs:Class >< /rdf:Description >< /rdf:RDF >