Go Back to Browsing Options
< rdf:RDF >
< rdf:Description rdf:about="8244" >
< dc:title >State v. Carl Williams< /dc:title >
< dc:date >2005-03-15 10:00:00< /dc:date >
< dc:format >< /dc:format >
< dc:language > en< /dc:language >
< dc:identifier >A-61-04< /dc:identifier >
< dc:description >Under the circumstances presented, should Rule 1:40-4(c) be relaxed to permit the testimony of a municipal court mediator to buttress defendant's claim of self-defense, and was this warrantless entry justified under the exigent circumstances exception to the warrant requirement?< /dc:description >
< rdfs:Class rdfs:label=" justice " >
< dc:contributer >Gilbert G. Miller< /dc:contributer >
< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="0" >< /rdfs:Class >
< dc:contributer >Paul H. Heinzel< /dc:contributer >
< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="1" >< /rdfs:Class >
< /rdf:Description >
< /rdf:RDF >