Go Back to Browsing Options
< rdf:RDF >
< rdf:Description rdf:about="8316" >
< dc:title >Notte v. Merchants Mutual Insurance Co.< /dc:title >
< dc:date >2005-11-07 14:20:00< /dc:date >
< dc:format >< /dc:format >
< dc:language > en< /dc:language >
< dc:identifier >A-19-05< /dc:identifier >
< dc:description >Where plaintiff's original complaint alleging violations of the Conscientious Employee Protection Act was barred by the one year statute of limitations period, did Rule 4:9-3 allow plaintiff to amend the complaint by adding claims under the Law Against Discrimination that could be deemed timely filed only if they relate back to the date of filing of the original complaint?< /dc:description >
< rdfs:Class rdfs:label=" justice " >
< dc:contributer >John M. Monahan< /dc:contributer >
< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="" >< /rdfs:Class >
< dc:contributer >Louis L. Chodoff< /dc:contributer >
< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="" >< /rdfs:Class >
< dc:contributer >David Zatuchni< /dc:contributer >
< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="1" >< /rdfs:Class >
< /rdf:Description >
< /rdf:RDF >