Go Back to Browsing Options
< rdf:RDF >< rdf:Description rdf:about="8444" >< dc:title >State v. M.C.< /dc:title >< dc:date >2006-11-14 10:11:00< /dc:date >< dc:format >< /dc:format >< dc:language > en< /dc:language >< dc:identifier >A-108-05< /dc:identifier >< dc:description >Should the Supreme Courts decision in State v WA 184 NJ 45 2005 which held that criminal defendants have a right to be present when a potential juror is being questioned at sidebar be applied prospectively only and does deviation from that requirement in these circumstances constitute reversible error?< /dc:description >< rdfs:Class rdfs:label=" justice " >< dc:contributer >Catherine A Foddai< /dc:contributer >< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="0" >< /rdfs:Class >< dc:contributer >Arthur J Owens< /dc:contributer >< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="1" >< /rdfs:Class >< /rdf:Description >< /rdf:RDF >