Go Back to Browsing Options
< rdf:RDF >
< rdf:Description rdf:about="8496" >
< dc:title >Liguori v. Elmann, M.D.< /dc:title >
< dc:date >2007-03-05 10:47:00< /dc:date >
< dc:format >< /dc:format >
< dc:language > en< /dc:language >
< dc:identifier >A-52-06< /dc:identifier >
< dc:description >In this medical malpractice case alleging negligence by an assistant cardiac surgeon during emergency care following a quadruple-bypass operation did the trial court err by instructing the jury that the assistant surgeon was to be held to the standard of care applicable to a general practitioner instead of that applicable to a specialist and did the emergency obviate the duty of the doctor to obtain the patients informed consent?< /dc:description >
< rdfs:Class rdfs:label=" justice " >
< dc:contributer >Adam M.Slater< /dc:contributer >
< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="0" >< /rdfs:Class >
< dc:contributer >Scott T. Heller< /dc:contributer >
< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="1" >< /rdfs:Class >
< dc:contributer >Judith A. Wahrenberger< /dc:contributer >
< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="1" >< /rdfs:Class >
< /rdf:Description >
< /rdf:RDF >