Go Back to Browsing Options
< rdf:RDF >
< rdf:Description rdf:about="8543" >
< dc:title >State v. George Jenewicz< /dc:title >
< dc:date >2007-09-11 10:07:00< /dc:date >
< dc:format >< /dc:format >
< dc:language > en< /dc:language >
< dc:identifier >A-78-06< /dc:identifier >
< dc:description >Was defendant entitled to a reversal of this murder conviction because of the prosecutors crossexamination of defendants expert on issues not testified to by the expert the jury instructions on defendants claim of selfdefense and the trial courts denial of defendants motion to sever the charge of hindering apprehension police violate defendants right not to incriminate himself with a twostep interrogation technique which involved questioning defendant before issuing Miranda warnings and then after defendant made incriminating statements issuing warnings and resuming questioning?< /dc:description >
< rdfs:Class rdfs:label=" justice " >
< dc:contributer >Daniel V. Gautieri< /dc:contributer >
< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="0" >< /rdfs:Class >
< dc:contributer >Nancy A. Hulett< /dc:contributer >
< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="1" >< /rdfs:Class >
< /rdf:Description >
< /rdf:RDF >