Go Back to Browsing Options
< rdf:RDF >
< rdf:Description rdf:about="9334" >
< dc:title >Nowel James v. New Jersey Manufacturers Ins. Co.< /dc:title >
< dc:date >2013-10-07 13:00:54< /dc:date >
< dc:format >< /dc:format >
< dc:language > en< /dc:language >
< dc:identifier >A-26-12< /dc:identifier >
< dc:description >Does NJSA 17:28-1.1 f which amended the statute on uninsured and underinsured motorists to prohibit use of step down provisions to reduce coverage available to an insureds employees apply retroactively to claims arising out of accidents that occurred and policies in existence prior to the effective date of the amendment and if so should the doctrine of manifest injustice be applied to bar retroactive application in this case?< /dc:description >
< rdfs:Class rdfs:label=" justice " >
< dc:contributer >Daniel J. Pomeroy< /dc:contributer >
< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="0" >< /rdfs:Class >
< dc:contributer >Alexander J. Rinaldi< /dc:contributer >
< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="1" >< /rdfs:Class >
< /rdf:Description >
< /rdf:RDF >