Go Back to Browsing Options
< rdf:RDF >
< rdf:Description rdf:about="9832" >
< dc:title >Berman, Sauter, Record & Jarddim v. Robinson< /dc:title >
< dc:date >2016-03-01 01:04:14< /dc:date >
< dc:format >< /dc:format >
< dc:language > en< /dc:language >
< dc:identifier >A-67-14< /dc:identifier >
< dc:description > In this attorney malpractice action, was it proper for the Appellate Division to raise the issue of the propriety of the trial judge’s participation, and to vacate and remand the trial court’s order on that basis?< /dc:description >
< rdfs:Class rdfs:label=" justice " >
< dc:contributer >Kurt W. Krauss< /dc:contributer >
< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="0" >< /rdfs:Class >
< dc:contributer >Kenneth S. Thyne< /dc:contributer >
< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="1" >< /rdfs:Class >
< /rdf:Description >
< /rdf:RDF >