Go Back to Browsing Options
< rdf:RDF >
< rdf:Description rdf:about="9964" >
< dc:title >STATE V. D.M.< /dc:title >
< dc:date >2016-11-29 03:10:23< /dc:date >
< dc:format >< /dc:format >
< dc:language > en< /dc:language >
< dc:identifier >A-45-15< /dc:identifier >
< dc:description >Did the trial court improperly permit the prosecutor to question defendant about evidence that previously had been ruled inadmissible under N.J.R.E. 404(b); were the trial courtís limiting instructions on this evidence improper; and did the prosecutorís statements during summation about this evidence constitute misconduct? < /dc:description >
< rdfs:Class rdfs:label=" justice " >
< dc:contributer >Alan L. Zegas< /dc:contributer >
< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="0" >< /rdfs:Class >
< dc:contributer >Catherine A. Foddai< /dc:contributer >
< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="1" >< /rdfs:Class >
< /rdf:Description >
< /rdf:RDF >