Go Back to Browsing Options
Argument ID8351
TitleState v. Anthony Mahoney
Date2006-01-31 11:18:00
DescriptionWas defendant, an attorney convicted of theft by failure to make proper disposition of property and forgery, entitled to a new trial because of the trial court's limitations on defendant's proffered character testimony, the trial court's jury instructions on the proper use of the rule regarding an attorney's bookkeeping responsibilities, and the prosecutor's use of a hypothetical scenario during summation?
Doc IDA-10-05
MetadataDublin Core
Video Feed

Counsel Type
Michael J. WilliamsAppellant
Dennis M. MahoneyRespondent
Jeffrey S. MandelRespondent