Go Back to Browsing Options
| Argument ID | 9637 |
| Title | STATE V. HOWARD JONES |
| Date | 2015-09-16 01:17:00 |
| Description | In this case involving a show-up identification shortly after the defendant allegedly exposed himself to the victim, did the Appellate Division properly apply the factors established in Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98, 114, 97 S.Ct. 2243, 53 L.Ed. 2d 140 (1977), to conclude that the victim’s identification was not impermissibly suggestive? |
| Appeal | |
| Opinion | |
| Doc ID | A-112-13 |
| Metadata | Dublin Core |
| Video Feed |
| Counsel | Type |
|---|---|
| Stephen P. Hunter | Appellant |
| Deborah C. Bartolomey | Respondent |
| Mfor T. Gary Mitchell | Respondent |