Go Back to Browsing Options
Argument ID8598
TitleState v. Carlos Feal
Date2008-01-23 11:23:00
DescriptionDoes the holding of State v Daniels 182 NJ 80 2004 which prohibits a prosecutor from commenting generally on a defendants ability to tailor his testimony because of his presence at trial apply retroactively to cases on direct appeal?
Appealhttp://njlaw.rutgers.edu/collections/courts/appellate/a0606-03.opn.html
Opinionhttp://njlaw.rutgers.edu/collections/courts/supreme/a-16-07.doc.html
Doc IDA-16-07
MetadataDublin Core
Video Feed


Counsel Type
Sara B. LiebmanAppellant
Frank J. PuglieseRespondent