Go Back to Browsing Options
Argument ID9679
TitleSTATE V. FELICIANO
Date2015-12-02 01:16:05
DescriptionDoes the roving warrant provision of the New Jersey Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-9(g), which allows the police to wiretap telephones not identified in the warrant application on a showing that the target has purposefully attempted to thwart interception by changing telephones, violate the particularity requirements of the New Jersey and federal constitutions?
Appeal
Opinion
Doc IDA-24-14
MetadataDublin Core
Video Feed


Counsel Type
Elizabeth C. JaritAppellant
Steven A. YomtovRespondent