Go Back to Browsing Options
Argument ID8609
TitleSenna v. Florimont
Date2008-02-20 10:01:00
DescriptionIn this defamation claim by an operator of a boardwalk arcade game against a competitor does the actual malice standard apply because arcade games are deemed a highlyregulated industry?
Doc IDA-35-07
MetadataDublin Core
Video Feed

Counsel Type
Scott D. SamanskyAppellant
Lara R. LovettRespondent