Go Back to Browsing Options
Argument ID8302
TitleState v. Clarence M. Moore
Date2005-10-24 11:00:00
DescriptionAfter the federal court issued a writ of habeas corpus in 1998 and reversed defendant's 1987 convictions, which included three counts of aggravated sexual assault, and permitted the State to retry defendant, is defendant entitled to a dismissal of the indictment based on the prosecutor's failure to advise the grand jury that the victims had been hypnotized to enhance their ability to remember identifying information about their attacker, and that one victim had previously misidentified the attacker?
Doc IDA-38-03
MetadataDublin Core
Video Feed

Counsel Type
Paul J. CasteleiroAppellant
Christopher D. AdamsAppellant
Matthew AstoreAppellant
James P. McClainRespondent
Nancy A. HulettRespondent