Go Back to Browsing Options
Argument ID9353
TitleState v. Kenneth W. Verpent
Date2013-11-07 10:39:13
DescriptionDid the trial court err in denying defendant’s motion to suppress the results of the urine test did the trial court abuse its discretion in admitting certain expert testimony that was allegedly beyond the scope of the expert’s qualifications and did the trial court impermissibly allow expert testimony on the ultimate issue of fact?
Doc IDA-38-12
MetadataDublin Core
Video Feed

Counsel Type
Frank M. GennaroAppellant
Catheirne A. FoddaiRespondent