Go Back to Browsing Options
Argument ID9454
TitleState v. R.K.
Date2014-10-07 13:15:59
DescriptionWas defendant entitled to a new trial because the fresh-complaint testimony was excessively detailed and cumulative and admitted without a limiting instruction, as well as other errors Chief Justice and Associates, Judge Cuff
Doc IDA-39-13
MetadataDublin Core
Video Feed

Counsel Type
Frank M. GennaroAppellant
Richard E. McKelveyRespondent