Go Back to Browsing Options
Argument ID101451014610147
TitleSTATE v. DONNA M. ALESSI IMO MICHAEL R. SPECK
Date2018-11-07 10:09:362018-11-07 10:09:432018-11-07 10:09:45
DescriptionDid police engage in an unconstitutional traffic stop and seizure that required the suppression of defendant’s statements and reversal of her convictions on the charges of filing false reports and hindering; did the admission of defendant’s statements also require reversal of her burglary conviction?", "Note": "Did police engage in an unconstitutional traffic stop and seizure that required the suppression of defendant’s statements and reversal of her convictions on the charges of filing false reports and hindering; did the admission of defendant’s statements also require reversal of her burglary conviction?", "Note": "Did police engage in an unconstitutional traffic stop and seizure that required the suppression of defendant’s statements and reversal of her convictions on the charges of filing false reports and hindering; did the admission of defendant’s statements also require reversal of her burglary conviction?", "Note": "
Appeal
Opinion
Doc IDA-41/42-17A-41/42-17A-41/42-17
MetadataDublin Core
Video Feed


Counsel Type
Jeffrey L. Weinstein Respondent
Jeffrey L. Weinstein Respondent
Jeffrey L. Weinstein Respondent