Go Back to Browsing Options
Argument ID8214
TitleJerista v. Murray
Date2005-01-03 11:45:00
DescriptionIn this legal malpractice action, was it appropriate to grant defendant's motion for summary judgment based on plaintiffs' failure to present an expert opinion to establish their case within a case?
Appealhttp://165.230.71.5/supct/opinions/050103c.pdf
Opinionhttp://njlaw.rutgers.edu/collections/courts/supreme/a-5-04.opn.html
Doc IDA-5-04
MetadataDublin Core
Video Feed


Counsel Type
Jack L. WolffAppellant
Mark M. TallmadgeRespondent
Edwin J. McCreedyRespondent