Go Back to Browsing Options
Argument ID8647
TitleBrundage v. Estate of Carl Carambio
Date2008-04-08 11:18:00
DescriptionDid plaintiffs attorney have an ethical responsibility under RPC 33a5 to disclose to an appellate panel considering a motion for leave to appeal that a similar legal issue was pending in another appeal in which the attorney was involved?
Doc IDA-56-07
MetadataDublin Core
Video Feed

Counsel Type
Patrick T. CollinsAppellant
David H. Dugan, IIIAppellant
David JayRespondent