Go Back to Browsing Options
| Argument ID | 8647 |
| Title | Brundage v. Estate of Carl Carambio |
| Date | 2008-04-08 11:18:00 |
| Description | Did plaintiffs attorney have an ethical responsibility under RPC 33a5 to disclose to an appellate panel considering a motion for leave to appeal that a similar legal issue was pending in another appeal in which the attorney was involved? |
| Appeal | http://njlaw.rutgers.edu/collections/courts/appellate/a5017-05.opn.html |
| Opinion | http://njlaw.rutgers.edu/collections/courts/supreme/a-56-07.doc.html |
| Doc ID | A-56-07 |
| Metadata | Dublin Core |
| Video Feed |
| Counsel | Type |
|---|---|
| Patrick T. Collins | Appellant |
| David H. Dugan, III | Appellant |
| David Jay | Respondent |