Go Back to Browsing Options
Argument ID8657
TitleState v. Shariff Ingram
Date2008-05-05 14:35:00
DescriptionWas defendant entitled to a new trial based on the trial courts failure to instruct the jury that if defendant possessed a less culpable state of mind than his coconspirators he could be found guilty as an accomplice to theft instead of the crimes of robbery and murder committed by the coconspirators?
Doc IDA-57-59-07
MetadataDublin Core
Video Feed

Counsel Type
Simon Louis RosenbachAppellant
Daniel V. GautieriRespondent