Go Back to Browsing Options
Argument ID9854
TitleROSENTHAL & ROSENTHAL, INC. V. VANESSA BENUN
Date2016-04-26 11:30:37
DescriptionIn this foreclosure action involving two creditors, did the mortgage secured by respondent in 2007 have priority over appellant's two earlier, recorded mortgages, where appellant continued to make optional advances to the mortgagor after having actual notice of respondent's mortgage?
Appeal
Opinion
Doc IDA-6-15
MetadataDublin Core
Video Feed


Counsel Type
Joshua A. ZielinskiAppellant
Matthew H. LewisRespondent