Go Back to Browsing Options
Argument ID8658
TitleDeNike v. Cupo
Date2008-05-06 12:40:00
DescriptionDid the trial judges actions negotiating future employment with the law firm representing plaintiff and accepting employment shortly after entry of the final judgment create an appearance of impropriety that requires vacating the judgment for plaintiff?
Doc IDA-61-07
MetadataDublin Core
Video Feed

Counsel Type
James F. KeeganAppellant
Thomas J. HertenRespondent