Go Back to Browsing Options
Argument ID8392
TitleState v. Afrim Marke
Date2006-05-01 10:36:00
DescriptionDid the State satisfy its burden of proof on the charge of driving while intoxicated with evidence that included the testimony of the police officer that defendant was very lethargic, dazed, and confused after the motor vehicle accident, and a blood test that was positive for methadone?
Doc IDA-67-05
MetadataDublin Core
Video Feed

Counsel Type
Marco M. BenucciAppellant
Joseph R. McCarthyRespondent