Go Back to Browsing Options
Argument ID8801
TitleRoa v. Roa
Date2009-09-14 10:02:00
DescriptionDid the defendant employers actions subsequent to the termination of plaintiffs employment constitute a continuing violation for determining whether plaintiffs Law Against Discrimination claim was timely filed?
Appealhttp://njlaw.rutgers.edu/collections/courts/appellate/a2588-06.opn.html
Opinionhttp://njlaw.rutgers.edu/collections/courts/supreme/a-72-08.opn.html
Doc IDA-72-08
MetadataDublin Core
Video Feed


Counsel Type
Dena E. EpsteinAppellant
Louis A. ZayasRespondent