Go Back to Browsing Options
Argument ID8996
TitleState v. Larry Henderson
Date2011-03-28 10:03:00
DescriptionDid the participation of the investigating officer in this eyewitness's identification of defendant in a photographic array require a presumption that the identification was impermissibly suggestive?
Doc IDA-8-08part2
MetadataDublin Core
Video Feed

Counsel Type
Deborah C. BartolomeyAppellant
Joseph E. KrakoraRespondent