Go Back to Browsing Options
Argument ID9661
TitleSTATE V. SCOTT M. CAIN
Date2015-10-26 11:50:57
DescriptionDid the assumed facts of a hypothetical posed to the prosecutor’s drug expert invade the jury’s province of deciding the ultimate issues; and was defendant denied a fair trial when the jury heard extensive testimony that police had obtained a warrant for his arrest and warrants to search his automobile and residence?
Appeal
Opinion
Doc IDA-8-14
MetadataDublin Core
Video Feed


Counsel Type
Brian F. PlunkettAppellant
Elizabeth R. RebeinRespondent