Go Back to Browsing Options
Argument ID8444
TitleState v. M.C.
Date2006-11-14 10:11:00
DescriptionShould the Supreme Courts decision in State v WA 184 NJ 45 2005 which held that criminal defendants have a right to be present when a potential juror is being questioned at sidebar be applied prospectively only and does deviation from that requirement in these circumstances constitute reversible error?
Doc IDA-108-05
MetadataDublin Core
Video Feed

Counsel Type
Catherine A FoddaiAppellant
Arthur J OwensRespondent