Go Back to Browsing Options
Argument ID8316
TitleNotte v. Merchants Mutual Insurance Co.
Date2005-11-07 14:20:00
DescriptionWhere plaintiff's original complaint alleging violations of the Conscientious Employee Protection Act was barred by the one year statute of limitations period, did Rule 4:9-3 allow plaintiff to amend the complaint by adding claims under the Law Against Discrimination that could be deemed timely filed only if they relate back to the date of filing of the original complaint?
Doc IDA-19-05
MetadataDublin Core
Video Feed

Counsel Type
John M. MonahanAppellant
Louis L. ChodoffAppellant
David ZatuchniRespondent