Go Back to Browsing Options
| Argument ID | 9964 |
| Title | STATE V. D.M. |
| Date | 2016-11-29 03:10:23 |
| Description | Did the trial court improperly permit the prosecutor to question defendant about evidence that previously had been ruled inadmissible under N.J.R.E. 404(b); were the trial court’s limiting instructions on this evidence improper; and did the prosecutor’s statements during summation about this evidence constitute misconduct? |
| Appeal | |
| Opinion | |
| Doc ID | A-45-15 |
| Metadata | Dublin Core |
| Video Feed |
| Counsel | Type |
|---|---|
| Alan L. Zegas | Appellant |
| Catherine A. Foddai | Respondent |