Go Back to Browsing Options
Argument ID9964
TitleSTATE V. D.M.
Date2016-11-29 03:10:23
DescriptionDid the trial court improperly permit the prosecutor to question defendant about evidence that previously had been ruled inadmissible under N.J.R.E. 404(b); were the trial courtís limiting instructions on this evidence improper; and did the prosecutorís statements during summation about this evidence constitute misconduct?
Appeal
Opinion
Doc IDA-45-15
MetadataDublin Core
Video Feed


Counsel Type
Alan L. ZegasAppellant
Catherine A. FoddaiRespondent