Go Back to Browsing Options
Argument ID8222
TitleNew Jerseyans for a Death Penalty Moratorium v. New jersey Department of Corrections
Date2005-02-28 14:00:00
DescriptionDo the fee enhancement principles adopted in Rendine v. Pantzer, 141 N.J. 292 (1995), apply to a case in which a pro bono attorney, acting without benefit of a written contingent fee agreement and without expectation of a fee from his client, successfully litigates a public interest matter under a statute containing a fee-shifting provision?
Doc IDA-63-04
MetadataDublin Core
Video Feed

Counsel Type
Lewis A. ScheindlinAppellant
Kevin D. WalshRespondent